We aren't using our frame capture system, so we aren't measuring frame latency or anything like that. I consider these tests to be somewhat of a "best case" for all the cards in our comparison. Now that we have taken a look at our gaming tests using our Frame Rating metrics and testing methods, we are including a set of tests from more standard benchmarks like Unigine Heaven and the new 3DMark benchmark. GTX 780 Ti and GTX 680 Comparison, Pricing and Closing Thoughts.Overclocking, Power Consumption, Noise Testing.DX12 Support, GameWorks VR, G-Sync Updates.The new GTX 980 Ti is here and as we found out, can match the performance of the TITAN X for a much lower price of 0!.Just make sure you have a case that can hold it. If money’s no object, you’re going to get a hell of a high performance card, no tuning required. Then again, you’re also paying for the convenience of this thing totally cruising out of the box. At $720, it’s priced at a premium over most 980 Tis the EVGA card is only $650, and some of the Matrix’s features won’t mean much for you if you don’t obsess over every percent gained in manual overclocking. The Matrix 980 Ti is begging to be shown off in a flashy case with a window, assuming you dig Asus’s look. And with the side panel off my case, I couldn’t hear either card unless I stuck my head right up to the system. Even overclocked the Matrix hovered around 65C, and while the EVGA card ran much hotter at idle (around 50C with the fans not even running), it only got up to the low 70s under full load. Most impressively, both cards stayed comfortably cool. I managed to add 75 MHz to the GPU clock and 100 MHz to the memory speed on the Matrix, topping 1500 MHz, although the average fps was negligibly higher at 59.8. That upped performance in the Heaven benchmark to an average 58.6 frames per second and a maxed turbo clock speed of 1433 MHz.ĭo you think the Matrix 980 Ti could do better? You bet it could. With about an hour of tinkering, I got the EVGA card to a stable overclock of +100 MHz on the GPU and +400 on the memory, with 56mv of extra voltage. In the Unigine Heaven benchmark, there was a more pronounced difference: 48.8 fps for the EVGA, 56 fps for the Matrix 980 Ti. The Matrix again did a few frames better at 39.6 fps average. In GTA5, the EVGA card turned in an average of 35.9 fps at 1440p with every graphics setting and advanced graphics setting turned all the way up, including 8x MSAA. Storage: Plextor M6e SSD, OCZ Vector 180 SSD Out of the box, the Matrix’s base clock is set at 1190 MHz and it turbos as high as 1317 MHz.Ĭooler: Enermax Liqtech 240 closed-loop liquid It easily blew past my EVGA 980 Ti SC Gaming ACX 2.0, which is already overclocked at 1102 MHz (that’s 102 MHz faster than the reference card’s GPU) and turbos to 1190 MHz. After spending some time testing the Matrix 980 Ti, I can imagine hardcore overclockers having a field day with this thing. Unlike some oversized aftermarket cards that use all that space for three air coolers, the Matrix 980 Ti sticks with two fans and Asus’ tried-and-true DirectCU II copper heatpipe system. And it’s a massive card by modern Nvidia standards, three slots wide and 11.5 inches long. The Matrix is Asus’s roided out top-end version of the 980 Ti, factory overclocked well beyond the average card with more headroom above that. The Asus Matrix 980 Ti doesn’t just say “look at me: I’m worth a lot of money.” It screams it while flexing the graphics card equivalent of its biceps so hard it threatens to rip its shirt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |